Importantly most of the aforementioned studies are based on cell lines

Importantly most of the aforementioned studies are based on cell lines. found in SC were also present in the differentiated counterpart.(TIF) pone.0146052.s002.tif (299K) GUID:?F8C71B34-6009-480A-BE5E-0CD3834AFA30 S3 Fig: Differentiated counterparts display a higher proliferative potential compared to SC. BAN ORL 24 (A) Cell count observed after 5 days of culture for 100 000 cells in the beginning plated. Representative physique of 2 impartial experiments. (B) Spheres of differentiated cultures are bigger than spheres derived from SC. (C) Colonies derived from differentiated culture T6 are bigger than colonies from T6 SC. For B-C data are shown T6 for and HT29 and are representative of 2 impartial and 1 single experiment for T6 and HT29, respectively. The number of spheres analysed for size is usually indicated around the Fig. Data is offered as mean SD, *P<0.05, **P<0.001, ***P<0.0001.(TIF) pone.0146052.s003.tif (199K) GUID:?1DE8E3F4-AE97-4A09-B4F3-920FB6F986A8 S4 Fig: Sphere-forming capacity of established cultures. (A) High numbers of cells form spheres just by fusion and aggregation, and not due to increased self-renewal properties. Self-renewal capacity determined by the 1000 cell sphere formation assay of early passage SC produced from main tumor tissue and CRC cell lines. Quantity of spheres observed by plating 1000 cells per well does not correlate to the results of the single cell assay offered in Fig 3, which might suggest that fusion and aggregation, rather than self-renewing capacity lead to sphere formation in the 1000 cell assay. Sphere formation was observed over several generations (gen.). Data are offered as mean SD. (B) Self-renewal capacity determined by the single cell assay of the differentiated counterparts (late passages) reversed to spheroid culturing conditions or managed in differentiating culturing conditions, respectively. Sphere formation was observed over two generations (gen.). Data is usually shown for T18 and offered as mean SD, *P<0.05, **P<0.001.(TIF) pone.0146052.s004.tif (145K) GUID:?C9572A2D-5525-4F09-AEE3-C60FE21352F3 S5 Fig: Sphere-forming capacity of main and xenograft derived SC. (A) and (B) Self-renewal capacity, shown by 1000 cell (left panel) and single cell (right panel) sphere forming assays, is not increased in xenograft-derived SC over several generations (gen.) compared to SC directly isolated from new tumor tissue. Data are offered as mean of 6 replicates SD. Xgen = xenograft-derived generation. (C) Xenograft-derived HCT116 SC grow as loosely packed aggregates that no longer resemble to spheres. (D) Morphological features of differentiated CRC SC. CRC spheroids adhere and differentiate when produced in medium supplemented with serum.(TIF) pone.0146052.s005.tif (1.1M) GUID:?C4AB133B-DBCF-4728-BCA3-CCBE966C5B31 S6 Fig: tumorigenic potential of SC. (A) SC derived from CRC cell lines are able to induce tumors in mice. (B) BAN ORL 24 Tumor excess weight of the generated tumor xenografts. n = 5, data are offered as imply SEM. (C) and (D) SC-derived xenografts (S) and xenografts generated from their differentiated counterparts (D) display similar expression patterns of stemness genes SOX2, OCT4, NANOG and LGR5. Data are offered as mean SD, *P<0.05, ns = not significant, n = 5.(TIF) pone.0146052.s006.tif (220K) GUID:?2134E0FF-384A-470D-BB91-FA9A61D28977 S7 Fig: Gene signature derived from SC predicts poor outcome in CRC patients. (A) Overall survival curves RCAN1 for CRC patients classified according to gene expression levels for the 8-gene sphere signature in the datasets “type”:”entrez-geo”,”attrs”:”text”:”GSE29621″,”term_id”:”29621″GSE29621. (B-C) The expression of two genes from our recognized gene signature (CDA & GSTA4) is usually linked to an increased risk of disease relapse in the dataset “type”:”entrez-geo”,”attrs”:”text”:”GSE39582″,”term_id”:”39582″GSE39582. The number of patients in each group is usually pointed out within the brackets; significant p-value is usually indicated. SC = spheroid cultures, D = differentiated counterparts.(TIF) pone.0146052.s007.tif (506K) GUID:?D1C8C083-9454-478B-A4EE-FD981E138B54 S1 Table: Main and secondary antibodies utilized for immunofluorescence analysis and FACS analysis as well as primer sequences used within the study. (PDF) pone.0146052.s008.pdf (48K) GUID:?47EB8EFB-F3C0-4EAA-AC84-E347EB17763C S2 Table: Patient Characteristics. (PDF) pone.0146052.s009.pdf (23K) GUID:?7F63F6B8-61EA-4B66-86AE-7B02F862C7B4 S3 Table: limiting dilution assays of CRC spheroid culturesSphere forming cell (SFC) frequency. (PDF) pone.0146052.s010.pdf (14K) GUID:?E06F2675-17F0-4A15-B20E-C5B492F9BF9E S4 Table: limiting dilution assays of CRC spheroid culturesCnumber of injected cells from dissociated spheroids and tumor formation occurrence in mice. (PDF) pone.0146052.s011.pdf (65K) GUID:?F52C7220-AB26-40BB-8809-46852C7B121F S5 Table: Chemosensitivity assays in SC and differentiated counterparts. Percentages of colony formation in SC and differentiated counterparts after 5FU treatment. (PDF) pone.0146052.s012.pdf (65K) GUID:?E86A2BD1-01E8-4F04-9F25-1A6AF8BB8523 S6 Table: Genes from your 8-gene signature and their functions. BAN ORL 24 (PDF) pone.0146052.s013.pdf (12K) GUID:?EFB67136-05A8-4D19-9203-9557ECFA0873 Data Availability StatementAll relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. All.